N2O control: High combustion temperatures and minimal excess air can minimize N2O formation. The use of selective non-catalytic reduction and selective catalytic reduction reduces N2O emissions. Ban Ki Moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations, called on world leaders to reach an agreement on the fight against global warming at the 69th session of the United Nations General Assembly[153] in New York on 23 September 2014. The next climate summit was held in Paris in 2015, which resulted in the Paris Agreement, the successor to the Kyoto Protocol. The 2010 Cancún Accords contain voluntary commitments by 76 developed and developing countries to control their greenhouse gas emissions. [145] In 2010, these 76 countries were jointly responsible for 85% of annual global emissions. [145] [146] Almost all scientists who study the atmosphere today believe that global warming is primarily the result of human action. Logically, what people have caused by their behavior should be able to be corrected by people who change their behavior. It is frustrating for many that coherent action to address the man-made global climate crisis is still pending.
All binding decisions under the Convention shall be taken by the Conference of the Parties. With 195 parties, this means that decision-making can take years. Some COPs are more important than others as important decisions evolve and a COP in which important decisions need to be taken becomes a turning point. This was the case at COP15, held in Copenhagen in 2009. At this COP, decisions were expected on what emission reduction commitments would look like after the end of the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol in 2020. In the end, only preliminary progress was made at this COP. These transparency and accountability provisions are similar to those of other international agreements. While the system does not involve financial sanctions, the requirements are aimed at easily tracking each nation`s progress and fostering a sense of global peer pressure, thus preventing any hesitation between countries considering doing so.
The Kyoto Protocol is an international treaty that extends the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which commits States Parties to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, based on the scientific consensus that (Part I) global warming is taking place and (Part Two) it is extremely likely that man-made CO2 emissions are primarily the cause. The Kyoto Protocol was adopted in Kyoto, Japan, on 11 December 1997 and entered into force on 16 February 2005. There are currently 192 Parties (Canada withdrew from the Protocol with effect from December 2012)[4] to the Protocol. the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) referred to in Article 12; On the 16th. Conference of the Parties in 2010, Parties to the UNFCCC agreed that future global warming should be limited below 2°C above pre-industrial temperature levels. [66] One of the levels of stabilization discussed in relation to this temperature target is to maintain atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases at 450 parts per million (ppm) of CO2 equivalent. [67] Stabilization at 450 ppm could be associated with a 26-78% risk of exceeding the 2°C target. [68] The 32-page document provides a framework for global climate action, including climate change mitigation and adaptation, support for developing countries, and transparency of reporting and strengthening of climate targets.
Here`s what it wants to do: The IPCC notes that climate change is only limited by „significant and sustainable reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.“ While one can debate the benefits of using a single global temperature threshold to represent dangerous climate change, the general scientific opinion is that any increase in global temperatures of more than 2 degrees Celsius would pose an unacceptable risk – potentially leading to mass extinctions, more severe droughts and hurricanes, and an aqueous Arctic. Moreover, while it remains unclear, as the IPCC notes, to what extent global warming will trigger „abrupt and irreversible changes“ in Earth`s systems, the risk of crossing the threshold only increases as temperatures rise. In fact, research clearly shows that the costs of climate inaction far outweigh the costs of reducing carbon pollution. A recent study suggests that if the United States fails to meet its Paris climate goals, it could cost the economy up to $6 trillion in the coming decades. A global failure to meet the NDCs currently set out in the agreement could reduce global GDP by more than 25% by the end of the century. At the same time, another study estimates that meeting – or even exceeding – the Paris targets through infrastructure investments in clean energy and energy efficiency could have huge global benefits – around $19 trillion. .